Efficacy of Two Mouth Rinses in Reducing Aerosol Bacterial Load during Ultrasonic Scaling

Main Article Content

Angabeen Anjum
Mervyn Hosein
Saima Akram Butt
Fakhuruddin .
Bina Fawad
Fizza Abidi

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two mouth washes namely Chlorhexidine 0.2% and 5% green tea mouth rinse when used as pre-procedural rinses in reducing the number of CFU in aerosol generated during ultrasonic scaling.

Study Design:  Quasi experimental study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Periodontology, Ziauddin college of Dentistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, between January 2019 to August 2019.

Methodology: 70 subjects were recruited in this study (43 males, 27 females: age range 18-65 years with presence of minimum 20 permanent functional teeth, less than 5 mm mean probing depth and plaque and gingival score between 1-3.

Subjects were randomly divided into two groups, group 1 and group 2. Each group comprised of 35 patients. A split mouth design technique was used for collecting the aerosol samples on blood agar plates. For every patient, there was a control side and test side of mouth. Ultrasonic scaling was done on control side without pre procedural rinsing and vice versa. Group 1 used 0.2% Chlorhexidine while group 2 rinsed with 5% green tea mouthwash. The blood agar plates were then transported to Microbiology lab and incubated for counting the colony forming units (CFU).

Results: Significant reduction of CFU occurred with pre procedural rinsing with both mouthwashes as compared to non-rinsing before ultrasonic scaling and 0.2% Chlorhexidine found to be superior to 5% green tea in reducing bacterial load in aerosol samples

Conclusion: Pre procedural mouth rinsing with effective mouthwashes significantly reduces aerosol contamination and should be used before all dental procedures that results in formation of aerosols and splatters along with some other infection control protocol to minimize the risks of cross infection in clinical settings.

Keywords:
Preprocedural rinsing, chlorhexidine, cross infection, ultrasonic scaling, aerosols, splatters, dental operatory, mouthwash, efficacy

Article Details

How to Cite
Anjum, A., Hosein, M., Butt, S. A., ., F., Fawad, B., & Abidi, F. (2019). Efficacy of Two Mouth Rinses in Reducing Aerosol Bacterial Load during Ultrasonic Scaling. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 31(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2019/v31i730311
Section
Original Research Article

References

Agrawal N, Gupta N, Bey A, Garg AK, Sharma V. Occupational hazards in modern dentistry: A review. Int J Med Health Res. 2014;1:1-9.

Mehta A, Gupta M, Upadhyaya N. Status of occupational hazards and their prevention among dental professionals in Chandigarh, India: A comprehensive questionnaire survey. Dental Research Journal. 2013;10(4):446.

Devker N, Mohitey J, Vibhute A, Chouhan VS, Chavan P, Malagi S, et al. A study to evaluate and compare the efficacy of preprocedural mouthrinsing and high volume evacuator attachment alone and in combination in reducing the amount of viable aerosols produced during ultrasonic scaling procedure. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13(5):681-9.

De Sio S, Traversini V, Rinaldo F, Colasanti V, Buomprisco G, Perri R, et al. Ergonomic risk and preventive measures of musculoskeletal disorders in the dentistry environment: an umbrella review. PeerJ. 2018;6:e4154.

Fasunloro A, Owotade FJ. Occupational hazards among clinical dental staff. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004;5(2):134- 52.

Dahiya P, Kamal R, Sharma V, Kaur S. “Hepatitis”–Prevention and management in dental practice. Journal of education and health promotion. 2015;4.

Shaghaghian S, Golkari A, Pardis S, Rezayi A. Occupational exposure of shiraz dental students to patients’ blood and body fluid. Journal of Dentistry. 2015; 16(3):206.

Harrel SK, Molinari J. Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: A brief review of the literature and infection control implications. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2004;135(4):429-37.

Sawhney A, Venugopal S, Babu GR, Garg A, Mathew M, Yadav M, et al. Aerosols how dangerous they are in clinical practice. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015;9(4):ZC52.

Gopalakrishnan D, Juluri R, Srihari J, Viswanathan V. Comparing the efficacy of two mouth rinses in reducing bacterial aerosol contamination. of. 2017; 4:2.

Al Maghlouth A, Al Yousef Y, Al Bagieh N. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of bacterial aerosols. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004;5(4):91-100.

Verma N, Baidya D, Makhijani B, Shetty N, Mathur A, Manohar B. Evaluation of aerosol contamination during ultrasonic procedures. Journal of Nepalese Society of Periodontology and Oral Implantology. 2017;1(1):17-22.

Kobza J, Pastuszka J, Brągoszewska E. Do exposures to aerosols pose a risk to dental professionals? Occupational Medicine. 2018;68(7):454-8.

Retamal-Valdes B, Soares GM, Stewart B, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Miller S, et al. Effectiveness of a pre-procedural mouthwash in reducing bacteria in dental aerosols: Randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Oral Research. 2017;31.

Ramesh A, Thomas JT, Muralidharan N, Varghese SS. Efficacy of adjunctive usage of hydrogen peroxide with chlorhexidine as preprocedural mouthrinse on dental aerosol. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2015; 5(5):431-5.

Narayana T, Mohanty L, Sreenath G, Vidhyadhari P. Role of preprocedural rinse and high volume evacuator in reducing bacterial contamination in bioaerosols. Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology: JOMFP. 2016;20(1):59.

Kaur R, Singh I, Vandana K, Desai R. Effect of chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, and ozone on microorganisms in dental aerosols: Randomized double-blind clinical trial. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2014;25(2):160.

Yadav S, Kumar S, Srivastava P, Gupta KK, Gupta J, Khan YS. Comparison of efficacy of three different mouthwashes in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler: A pilot study. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2018;10(1): 6.

Rao RM. Determination of efficacy of pre-procedural mouth rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scalers. Nitte University Journal of Health Science. 2015;5(3):52-6.

Rani KR, Ambati M, Prasanna JS, Pinnamaneni I, Reddy PV, Rajashree D. Chemical vs. herbal formulations as pre-procedural mouth rinses to combat aerosol production: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Oral Research and Review. 2014;6(1):9.

Eshghpour M, Mortazavi H, Rezaei NM, Nejat A. Effectiveness of green tea mouthwash in postoperative pain control following surgical removal of impacted third molars: Double blind randomized clinical trial. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013;21(1):59.

Priya BM, Anitha V, Shanmugam M, Ashwath B, Sylva SD, Vigneshwari S. Efficacy of chlorhexidine and green tea mouthwashes in the management of dental plaque-induced gingivitis: A comparative clinical study. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2015;6(4):505.

Reddy S, Prasad MS, Kaul S, Satish K, Kakarala S, Bhowmik N. Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2012;16(2):213.

Ammu A, Varma S, Suragimath G, Zope S, Pisal A, Gangavati R. Evaluation and comparison of Two commercially available mouthrinses in reducing aerolised bacteria during ultrasonic scaling when used as a preprocedural rinse. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2019;22(2):235-40.

Shetty SK, Sharath K, Shenoy S, Sreekumar C, Shetty RN, Biju T. Compare the efficacy of two commercially available mouthrinses in reducing viable bacterial count in dental aerosol produced during ultrasonic scaling when used as a preprocedural rinse. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14(5):848-51.

Sethi G, Kumar K. A comparative evaluation of efficacy of 0.2% chlorhexidine with a herbal mouthwash as pre-procedural mouthrinse in the reduction of aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences. 2018;2:02-6.

Hasanah NT, Kasuma N, Fitriana A. The Difference of bacterial aerosol quantity based on blood agar plate position. UI Proceedings on Health and Medicine. 2017;1:83-8.

Pathan MM, Bhat KG, Joshi VM. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of a herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine mouthwash on select periodontal pathogens: An in vitro and ex vivo study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2017;21(4):270.

Thomas A, Thakur SR, Shetty SB. Anti-microbial efficacy of green tea and chlorhexidine mouth rinses against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacilli spp. and Candida albicans in children with severe early childhood caries: A randomized clinical study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2016;34(1):65.

Jenabian N, Moghadamnia AA, Karami E. The effect of Camellia Sinensis (green tea) mouthwash on plaque-induced gingivitis: a single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2012;20(1):39.